Quantifying Perceptions of Journal-Related Barriers to Research Among PakistaniPostgraduate Medical Professionals: A Preliminary Study

Abstract

Objective:

To quantify journal-related barriers to research perceived by postgraduate Pakistani medical professionals while publishing in a medical journal.

Methods:

In this analytical cross-sectional study, data were collected between June and September of 2025 via an online questionnaire administered to Pakistani medical post-graduate practitioners using convenience sampling, via professional contacts and social media. The questionnaire quantified barriers to submission processes, review processes, financial aspects, access restrictions, and support needs. Descriptive statistics and Spearman's rank correlation, one-way ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U test, and independent-sample t-test were used to analyse the data, with a statistical significance level of p<0.05.

Results:

Fifty-four practitioners participated (74.1% male; mean age 36.4 years); 38.9% had <2 years’ post-qualification experience, and 77.8% were based in Pakistan. Publication fee was perceived as the biggest barrier (M=3.93), followed by access restrictions (M=3.70) and review delays (M=3.63). Barrier perception score negatively correlated with number of publications. (rs=-0.42, p<0.01). Early-career professionals reported greater formatting difficulties (M=3.95 vs. 2.63; p=0.002). Fast review, fee waivers, and mentorship were most requested.

Conclusion:

This preliminary study shows that Pakistani postgraduate medical professionals may face several barriers to publishing in journals. These may include the cost of publication, inaccessibility, and slow review times. Respondents with greater publication experience reported lower barrier perception scores, indicating the need for support at the beginning of a career. A fast review process, funding, structured mentorship and statistical assistance were the most sought after support.